{"product_id":"manuscrito-sa-c-xvii-manuscript-17th-century-fine-of-lands-between-harper-bennet-hursley-england","title":"MANUSCRITO, SÉC. XVII - MANUSCRIPT, 17TH CENTURY. FINE OF LANDS BETWEEN HARPER \u0026 BENNET. [HURSLEY - ENGLAND]","description":"\u003cp\u003eDocumento redigido no «\u003cem\u003eCourt of the Common Bench»\u003c\/em\u003e também conhecido por «\u003cem\u003eCourt of the Common Pleas\u003c\/em\u003e», situado no \u003cem\u003eWestminster Hall\u003c\/em\u003e no Palácio de Westminster, a 6 de Maio de 1658. (pode ler-se no documento: \u003cem\u003efrom Easter Day in fifteen days in the Year afo[rementioned] Lord one thousand six hundred fifty eight.\u003c\/em\u003e).\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eManuscrito de 23x48,5 cm. Com uma folha de pergaminho escrita por mão firme, com letra redonda em tinta castanha, ao longo de 24 linhas na frente e com assinaturas no verso.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEste documento trata-se de uma \u003cem\u003efine of lands\u003c\/em\u003e. Os autores do processo foram Walter Harper \u0026amp; Thomas Tomkins. Os réus foram Haark Bennett e Elizabeth Bennett, William Todd e Wynyfride Todd, Edward Greenly e Alice Greenly, John Bevan e Johan Bevan, John Bowyer e Elizabeth Bowyer. São referidas propriedades em Hursley, Letton, Mowley, Pembridge, Marston, Bury, Weston e outras. Os juízes que supervisionaram este processo foram Oliver Saint John, Edward Atkyns, Matthew Hale e Hwyh Wyndham. Os autores pagaram aos réus sessenta libras esterlinas.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA \u003cem\u003efine of lands\u003c\/em\u003e ou \u003cem\u003efinal concord\u003c\/em\u003e era uma espécie de falso procedimento legal que tinha o efeito de transmitir propriedade de uma parte a outra, a troco de uma soma monetária, não se tratando, contudo, de um contrato de compra e venda ou arrendamento. Existiu em Inglaterra desde o século XII até à sua abolição em 1833. O processo dava-se, normalmente, no \u003cem\u003eCourt of the Common Pleas — \u003c\/em\u003ecriado no final do século XII, instalou-se em Westminster Hall até à sua extinção em 1880. Este tribunal teria jurisdição sobre todos os assuntos de transferência de propriedade, em exclusivo entre particulares, sobretudo quando existia falta de relevância para o Rei (Coroa). Terá sido o órgão mais relevante para a jurisprudência medieval, embora não tenha sido o mais alto dos tribunais de \u003cem\u003ecommon law\u003c\/em\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNestes processos, o autor (em inglês \u003cem\u003eplaintiff\u003c\/em\u003e) interpunha uma ação em tribunal para recuperar as terras do réu (em inglês \u003cem\u003edeforciant\u003c\/em\u003e), alegando que elas eram suas. O réu, por sua vez, simplesmente concordava com a alegação. O autor acordava então em pagar-lhe uma soma de dinheiro pelo acordo, passando a propriedade para o nome do primeiro.\u003cbr\u003eNa prática, o que realmente acontecia era que o autor estava prestes a comprar o terreno ao réu, atual proprietário, havendo ambas as partes acordado previamente nesta transação. Uma vez que não se tratava de um contrato legal de transferência de propriedade, esta era descrita de forma extremamente vaga. O dinheiro pago pelo acordo é frequentemente uma aproximação do valor real da propriedade.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eO documento era escrito em triplicado numa folha de pergaminho grande, que era depois cortada em linhas onduladas, com a palavra latina \u003cem\u003echirographum (\u003c\/em\u003eocasionalmente substituída por algum outro termo) escrita ao longo do local onde as linhas deviam ser cortadas. Cada parte do acordo retinha uma cópia, que se tornava na escritura de propriedade do terreno do comprador, sendo a terceira (\u003cem\u003efoot of fine\u003c\/em\u003e) arquivada pelo tribunal como registo do procedimento. Este foi um processo utilizado durante séculos como garantia de autenticidade.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThomas Tomkins (c. 1605 – 1674) foi um político inglês, partidário de Carlos I durante a Guerra Civil Inglesa e membro da Casa dos Comuns por várias vezes, entre 1640 e 1674.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOliver Saint John (1598 – 1673), foi um político inglês e um dos líderes da oposição parlamentar ao governo de Carlos I na Inglaterra. Membro da Câmara dos Comuns entre 1640 e 1653 e Presidente do \u003cem\u003eCourt of the Common Pleas\u003c\/em\u003e entre 1648 e 1660.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEdward Atkyns (1587 – 1669), \u003cem\u003eChief Baron of the Exchequer.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatthew Hale (1609 – 1676), foi um influente advogado, jurista e juiz inglês, reconhecido pelo seu tratado \u003cem\u003eHistoria Placitorum Coronæ\u003c\/em\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[EN] Document drafted in the «\u003cem\u003eCourt of the Common Bench»\u003c\/em\u003e also known as «\u003cem\u003eCourt of the Common Pleas\u003c\/em\u003e», located in the \u003cem\u003eWestminster Hall\u003c\/em\u003e at the Palace of Westminster on 6 May 1658 (the document reads: \u003cem\u003efrom Easter Day in fifteen days in the Year afo[rementioned] Lord one thousand six hundred fifty eight.\u003c\/em\u003e).\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eManuscript. 23x48.5 cm. Sheet of parchment written by a firm hand, in round letters in brown ink, over 24 lines on the front and with signatures on the back.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis document is a \u003cem\u003efine of lands\u003c\/em\u003e. The \u003cem\u003eplaintiffs\u003c\/em\u003e were Walter Harper \u0026amp; Thomas Tomkins. The \u003cem\u003edeforciants\u003c\/em\u003e foram Haark Bennett e Elizabeth Bennett, William Todd e Wynyfride Todd, Edward Greenly e Alice Greenly, John Bevan e Johan Bevan, John Bowyer e Elizabeth Bowyer. Properties in Hursley, Letton, Mowley, Pembridge, Marston, Bury, Weston and others are mentioned. The judges overseeing this case were Oliver St John, Edward Atkyns, Matthew Hale and Hwyh Wyndham. The \u003cem\u003eplaintiffs\u003c\/em\u003e paid the \u003cem\u003edeforciants\u003c\/em\u003e sixty sterling pounds.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003efine of lands\u003c\/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003efinal concord\u003c\/em\u003e was a kind of false legal procedure that had the effect of transferring property from one party to another in exchange for a monetary sum, although it was not a contract of sale or lease. It existed in England from the 12th century until its abolition in 1833. The process usually took place in the \u003cem\u003eCourt of the Common Pleas\u003c\/em\u003e created at the end of the 12th century, housed in Westminster Hall until its extinction in 1880. This court had jurisdiction over all property transfer matters, exclusively between private individuals, especially when there was a lack of relevance to the Crown. It may have been the most important body in medieval jurisprudence, although it was not the highest of the courts of \u003cem\u003ecommon law\u003c\/em\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn these proceedings, the \u003cem\u003eplaintiff\u003c\/em\u003e filed a lawsuit to recover the lands of the \u003cem\u003edeforciant\u003c\/em\u003e claiming that they were his. The \u003cem\u003edeforciant\u003c\/em\u003e, for his part, simply agreed with the claim. The \u003cem\u003eplaintiff\u003c\/em\u003e then agreed to pay him a sum of money for the agreement, passing the property on to the \u003cem\u003eplaintiff\u003c\/em\u003e. In practice, what actually happened was that the \u003cem\u003eplaintiff\u003c\/em\u003e was about to buy the land from the \u003cem\u003edeforciant\u003c\/em\u003e, the current owner, and both parties had previously agreed to this transaction. Since this was not a legal contract for the transfer of ownership, it was described extremely vaguely. The money paid for the agreement is often an approximation of the real value of the property.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe document was written in triplicate on a large sheet of parchment, which was then cut into wavy lines, with the Latin word \u003cem\u003echirographum\u003c\/em\u003e (occasionally replaced by some other term) written along the place where the lines were to be cut. Each party to the agreement retained a copy, which became the title deed to the buyer\"s land, the third (\u003cem\u003efoot of fine\u003c\/em\u003e) being filed by the court as a record of the proceedings. This was a process used for centuries as a guarantee of authenticity.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThomas Tomkins (c. 1605 - 1674) was an English politician, a supporter of Charles I during the English Civil War and a member of the House of Commons on several occasions between 1640 and 1674.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOliver Saint John (1598 - 1673), was an English politician and one of the leaders of the parliamentary opposition to the government of Charles I in England. He was a member of the House of Commons between 1640 and 1653 and President of the \u003cem\u003eCourt of the Common Pleas\u003c\/em\u003e between 1648 and 1660.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEdward Atkyns (1587 – 1669), \u003cem\u003eChief Baron of the Exchequer.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatthew Hale (1609 - 1676), was an influential English lawyer, jurist and judge, recognised for his treatise \u003cem\u003eHistoria Placitorum Coronæ\u003c\/em\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Garimpo dos Livros","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":58295753474380,"sku":"2302SB002","price":3600.0,"currency_code":"BRL","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1066\/5617\/0316\/files\/2302SB002_1.png?v=1785850553","url":"https:\/\/garimpodoslivros.com.br\/products\/manuscrito-sa-c-xvii-manuscript-17th-century-fine-of-lands-between-harper-bennet-hursley-england","provider":"Garimpo dos Livros","version":"1.0","type":"link"}